U.S MILITARY TO DEPLOY LONG RANGE ANTI-SHIP MISSILE (LRASM) FROM MULTIPLE PLATFORMS !


The U.S has by far the largest defense budget
in the world. It has been at the forefront of many grounds
breaking technology when it comes to military weapons like 5th generation fighter, stealth
bombers, etc. US Navy is the most well-equipped navy in
the world. It operates around 10 nuclear-powered supercarriers
which are more than all the other nations combined. But there is one area where the U.S seems
to have lagged far behind -Anti Ship Missiles. But things are changing as the US Navy has
pushed into production the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile or LRASM. In this video Defense Updates analyzes how
the US plans to destroy Russian & Chinese warships with Long Range Anti-Ship Missile? Let’s get into the details. This video is sponsored by the free-to-play
military vehicle combat game War Thunder. We talk a lot about military vehicles on this
channel, but what about trying them out for yourself? In War Thunder, you can chose from more than
1200 playable vehicles from the 1930s to the 1990s and go to battle on more than 80 theaters
of war. You can fly aircraft, helicopters, drive tanks
and command ships of all types and sizes, which have all been carefully recreated from
their real-world counterparts. It’s available as a free download on PC, PlayStation4
and Xbox One with cross-platform support, so grab your friends and give it a try! All viewers of Defense Updates that register
using the link in the description below will also get a free premium tank or aircraft or
ship and three days of premium account time as a bonus. The U.S has been fighting with adversaries
that have no or very small navy like Iraq or Afghanistan. The inadequacy in Anti Ship capability crept
in mainly due to a lack of credible opponents. America was focusing on military assets that
were more in line with these battles like the development of drones. This lead to a lull in the development of
advance Anti-ship missiles. But things have changed in the last decade
as Russia & China have developed a range of anti-ship missiles that challenge the supremacy
of U.S surface warfare capability. Both of these countries have strong navies
and are actively pursuing ways to counter the U.S Navy by developing a wide variety
of Anti-ship missiles that can target U.S warships from long ranges. Now the U.S is responding to the emerging
threat. The U.S currently uses Harpoon missile as
the main Anti Ship weapon. Initially developed in the 1970s, it has seen
many upgraded over the year but is essentially a 5-decade old design. It is an over-the-horizon, anti-ship missile
manufactured by Boeing. Harpoon ER (Extended Range) can reach targets
at a maximum distance of 80 miles or 130 KM. It has a speed of Mach 0.7, which means it
has high subsonic speed but not supersonic. U.S do have SM1, SM 2 & SM6 supersonic missiles
which have a primary role of air defense with a secondary Anti Ship role, but their small
warheads are not capable of crippling a large warship. The only credible anti-ship weapon is the
NSM The Naval Strike Missiles or NSM is the upgrade
of Kongsberg’s Penguin short-to-medium range anti-ship guided missile. The missile has a range of 100 miles or 185
km. NSM is capable of high subsonic speeds. It has sea skim mode by which it travels very
close to the surface, making it hard to detect and intercept. It is also designed to maneuver to avoid enemy
defenses. It is equipped with a 276 pounds or 125 kg
multi-purpose blast/fragmentation warhead. NSM features an imaging IR-seeker which is
complimented by inertial/GPS navigation. The missile also has a built-in database of
representative ship types to distinguish between intended targets and other objects. But even NSM is constrained by its range. For example, the Indo Russian Brahmos missile
can fly at supersonic speed and have a range of 185 miles or 300 km. Its range is being upgraded. The Russian ramjet-powered P-800 Oniks is
capable of streaking at naval targets up to 370 miles or 600 km away at speeds of Mach
2.5 The Chinese YJ-12 has a speed of around Mach
2, if launched from low altitude and up to Mach 3.2, if launched from high altitude. It has a maximum range of around 235 miles
or 380 km depending on launch altitude. The 3M22 Zircon developed by Russia is said
to have the capability to reach speed up to Mach 8 and has a max range of 600 miles or
around 1000 km depending on launch trajectory. These missiles outrange American once and
because of their supersonic speed will be hard to intercept especially when a barrage
of these is fired. The AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff
Missile is a stealthy and highly precise surface-skimming cruise missile with a range of 230 miles or
620 for the Extended Range AGM-158B. Viewers may note that a shorter range variant
was used in combat on April 4, 2018, when two B-1B bombers launched nineteen of the
stealth missiles at a Syrian research center in Barzeh. Lockheed Martin worked on the missile further
and AGM-158C is developed which is an antiship variant and is named LRSM by the U.S Navy. The missile is subsonic and but since it is
LO (Low Observable), the enemy warship will not see it coming till it is very close. This strategy is a stark contrast to Russian
and Chinese missile which depend on speed to defeat the ship’s defense. It is powered by an F107 turbofan engine and
has a 1,000 lb (450 kg) blast-fragmentation penetrator. The warhead is potent enough to cripple a
large warship. LRASM will cost around $3 million apiece which
makes it twice as costly asHarpoon missiles.US Navy plans to acquire 467 LRASMs with an initial
order of 23. LRASM deploys multiple sensors & techniques
to home in on the targets. The details are here: 1. It has an inertial and jam-resistant GPS navigation
system. This is mainly used for navigating the initial
phase of the journey. 2. A two-way data link is present, which allows
the launching warship to send course corrections data. It will be used for mid-course guidance during
which missile flies at medium altitude. 3. It has a guidance algorithm that can acquire
& target enemy ships when external guidance is disrupted. It is mainly used in the mid to final phase. The algorithm is smart enough to differentiate
civilian ships and low priority enemy warships from the actual target. 4. It has a Radio-frequency sensor which is activated
in the terminal phase. The system homes in on an adversary’s radar
signals—the very radar which is used by the enemy warships to track the missile. 5. In the terminal phase, the Infra Red sensor
is also engaged. It is used to make the last-ditch adjustment
so that the missile can hit specific points of an enemy warship to maximize damage. In this phase, the missile skims close to
the surface which makes it hard to target. It is important to note that LRASMs can be
deployed in swarm mode which will enable it to saturate enemy defenses. LRASM also deploys electronic counter-countermeasures
(ECCM) to overcome the enemy’s countermeasures. The U.S Navy’s carrier-based FA-18E or F
Super Hornet jets will start deploying LRASM this year. This will be followed up with them being deployed
from the cells of the Mark 41 Vertical Launch System. The surface-to-surface LRASM variant will
be fitted with Mark 114 rocket boosters which are jettisoned after launch. Viewers may note that US Navy’s Arleigh
Burke class Destroyers have 96 Mark 41 cells whereas Ticonderoga class Cruisers have 122
of these. So, the 65+ Arleigh Burke class Destroyers
and 22 Ticonderoga class Cruisers will be able to deploy the LRASM seamlessly. A submarine-launched variant is also expected
to be developed. The multiple launch platform makes LRASM fit
perfectly in the US Navy’s “Distributed Lethality” doctrine according to which firepower
is spread across multiple platforms. LRASM will add much-needed punch to the U.S
Navy’s surface-warfare capabilities.

You may also like...

100 Responses

  1. The Green Bastard says:

    What good would these be against the likes of Russia and China when they would have already been taken out by Russia and China's (almost) impossible to defend against hypersonic anti-ship missiles?

  2. Dennis Bell says:

    Thanks good vlog.

  3. TheCrackupboom says:

    Just because America spends the most money in the world on its military doesn't mean it comes close to getting the most military capability from those dollars; many of which are wasted on legions of support personnel engaged in tasks such as keeping different races and ethnicities from attacking each other to, in essence, sexual referees (Sex assault Officers), who have vast workforces at all military installations. Then we have to look at he manufacturing capability of the Chinese vs Americans. Chinese build one mile of high speed railroad for 30 million and it costs America 150 million. In addition the Chinese don't have to have their ships on the sea at all if hostilities commence. The Chinese can shoot their missiles from far inside their country and knock out American ships. Admiral Hyman Rickover said the aircraft carriers would last two days in war. The Chinese ballistic missile force is decisive in my opinion.

  4. Aaron says:

    We are not planning to blow up any Russian ships. Just stop.

  5. Lairdriver says:

    I'll say this, the US doesn't have a specific need for a hypersonic ASM. But they already one in a new variant of the SM3. The Chinese and Russians think that firing a missle at mach 6 at 500 km away is more efficient at ship killing than a missle capable of course corrections, skimming sea surface and interconnectivity with other systems it can take data from. In a doctrine of war scenario, it may be favorable to fire anti ship missles that destroy or disable ships but leave the crew a chance to survive. This would help with de-escalation. If the Chinese fired an ASM at an aircraft carrier – that would kill 5000 people. The US would do everything up to and including potentially using a nuclear weapon to destroy a Chinese fleet. But if they shot the carrier and disabled it without slaughtering everyone – there is room for de-escalation. But if you are using hypersonic missles with massive warheads – there is no room for defending yourself against retaliation.

  6. Dirty Sanchez says:

    Sorry china and russia. You continue to suck dick lolol

  7. silent watcher says:

    Fake news. US never had long range anti ship missile.

  8. Jpts13 says:

    Unfortunately they are behind Russia and chine already

  9. prashanth.L gowdas says:

    LRASM missile dont have radar jammer or hypersonic speed in phase 3 .so it's will be defended by enemy ship easily.. ..

  10. terry waller says:

    Even the Littoral combat ships are getting a new anti ship missile that can also be used against land targets. A Group of LCS's can launch attacks from multiple directions in conjunction with attacks from Arleigh Burk destroyers and Ticonderoga Cruisers. In addition to F35's.

  11. Joe Venecia says:

    21 dislike were chinese.

  12. THEfamouspolka says:

    Need info on the US's strategy to defeat incoming supersonic missiles to our surface vessels.

  13. Skoll _ says:

    The combo of the subject matter and the factual and friendly presenter is a little disturbing in an Orwellian way. Do like the vids though. Also slightly disturbing;)

  14. Mr2pint says:

    The Russian and Chinese missiles are fake which is why the United States of America has not had to update its own anti-ship missiles. The US has the best anti ship missiles so no need to worry

  15. Etech2x Won says:

    Who is making bets on who, or what, will be the 1st to be on the receiving end of one of these??? Hmmmm Lets hope it never comes to that…but you just know, it won't be long..

  16. Aurobindo Ghosh says:

    the missile couldn't be bigger than it is?

  17. B2G says:

    Most people don't know that these big fast ASMs need to fly very high because they are too fast to sea skim. Any ship radar will be able to see them from hundreds of miles away giving it much more time to react. Low, slow, and stealthy ASMs like the NSM and LRASM are actually more lethal despite being slower. Most ships will only be able to use close-in defenses once the missile is able to be tracked.

  18. SmithN' Wesson says:

    Should have focused on making high supersonic cruise missiles with long range. It's easier to engineer a mach 2.5 cruise missile instead of a mach 6 one due to the heat. And it's fast enough at mach 2.5 to be hard to shoot down since it allows little reaction time.

  19. Victor Suarez says:

    Trump is fixing the crippled military Obama left behind,

  20. tobigforyou says:

    Nothing on the Kh-32?

  21. GreensOplenty says:

    rush area 51 crowd – "its a ufo!"

  22. J. VONWILL says:

    Can we put our money in better things please like clean water or something?

  23. mabel del mas says:

    May I invite you all to clean your karma? In India, they know that karma controls life, illness and death. Yet, in India today, more than eleven million people are cleaning their karma. They are escaping the karmic trap, you see. In the West, more than 10,000 people are doing the same thing. The Indians are right, you see. Here is a simple 35 minute video that will show you your karma and tell you what to do with it. http://www.instant-freedom.com/path.html
    And, if you want to take a further step, please click on Second Attention on the menu.
    Good luck.

  24. alias177 says:

    Focused on drones not missles…. No Obama cut funding and that's why we are 'behind', including hypersonic. Thanks Obama.

  25. Nikon Sarkar says:

    West of dollars,in front of Russia,any Russian ship can't be even touch by this joke,

    All most every anti-ship cruise system play massive manuvare in terminal stages, but they are best because of combo of hypersonic+ manuvare , supersonic+ manuvare.

    And as I understand laser weapons are not effective agnest any crussmessile so all countries are trying to develop hypersonic crussmessile at any cost

  26. EVERARD PISSWIDDLE says:

    Trump wont fire on his bosses in Russia & China. He's more likely to turn on NATO. Ask the Kurds .

  27. Adya Soni says:

    The LRASM is nothing in comparision to Brahmos see its speed…

  28. Eric Christen says:

    The question is how visible or traceable are these missiles? Anti- missile defences exist on ships, right? What might be an idea here is to have decoy missiles mixed with the real ones, as well as diversionary missiles of a different type. Missiles equipped with jamming devices could be effective. These devices could distort ship equipment readings or project holographic missiles as diversions. Create additional confusion by staggering the assault with overlapping projectiles. If you guys need additional ideas consultants that are patriots, I'm at your service. See www.christolides.com.

  29. Дмитрий Телпиз says:

    overpriced susbonic junk made by garbage company)) even the engine is just a derivative of old design from 70's)

  30. albert johnson says:

    russia has the edge over the us on missles.

  31. Evan Horn says:

    War Thunder SUCKS Donkey!!!

  32. B K says:

    Making this operational would only mean a first strike would come from land.

  33. Noble Young says:

    🇺🇸🤦🏻‍♂️🗯Man Can We Please Blow Some Sh💩t Up Now 😳

  34. P. Hamilton says:

    It seems that any warship….is just a target waiting for a missile to destroy it. You can imagine that all the Nations using War as a means of Elitist Profiteering….have missiles like these…or will soon have them. Besides, Hyper Sonic Missile Tech is said to have been sold off to US adversaries during the Obama Era…which shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone.

  35. Raj Kumar says:

    I think this channel will lead to ww3 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  36. Alton Xander says:

    👃🇺🇸

  37. chris r says:

    You can have the best military in history but if you have a government full of globalist traitors that can corrupt people's minds with their bought media, it will not make a difference. They will invade and take over right through the back door with the brain washeds blessings.

  38. A Papa says:

    They won't have time to reach their target jenius 😄

  39. John K says:

    Get on with it

  40. V Philip says:

    Like all US products it fails.

  41. Glenn Ridsdale says:

    NSM is NOT an upgraded Penguin. It's designed by the same company (Kongsberg) but is an entirely new weapon.

  42. kazoua yang says:

    Lol the U.S just needs to forces on inpeaching Trump and kicking his Administration out of the white house that's alk we U.S should be focusing on.

  43. Prasun Kumar says:

    None of this will matter when the Google quantum ai decides to launch every nuke in the planet

  44. D Wall says:

    The big need is for anti-submarine missiles for the new undetectable russian subs.

  45. Mark Cooke says:

    Do a video on the new revolutionary jet engine Britain has developed which will change missile and future fighter jets

  46. Mark Cooke says:

    People going on about hypersonic missiles….do you know how hard it would be to guide one in on target at those speeds….near impossible

  47. Charles Bellino says:

    💪💪🇺🇸🇺🇸

  48. jbgrooves says:

    What is meant to protect us is slowly destroying us choking off funding of every other budget line item.
    Cut the military's budget by 33% and pin it to inflation only to exceed inflations growth if the president declares and 60% of congress approves a national emergency declaration or war.

  49. khapsha1000 says:

    Never knew Afghanistan has a navy.

  50. Desire123ification says:

    Once upon a time David fought a giant called Goliath and won! According to the "Good Book". The problem with US Armed Forces mirrors the above Biblical confrontation; meaning the size of the US Military could provoke its own demise…  Simply by "cherry-picking" method from the distance and/or with saturation strikes. Again Russia with a "lean and mean" approach, has the upper hand. Having a flurry of extremely well-equipped frigates and corvettes scattered along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. Constantly in permutation between brown and blue waters. Case in point; during the Venezuelan Crisis; the US sent two carrier groups, few days later Russia replied by sending a single frigate with a pair of support ships via the Panama Canal. Result: No strike!

  51. Jeff Sutthoff says:

    Aww man we gotta fire off summa dees! Go MIC!!

  52. chinablue 2nel says:

    This American media propaganda vedeo is totally
    Bias in everything
    Russia had the most effective systems in missile defense and offence

  53. Dan Olsen says:

    This is stupid and our government wound keep it secret. Why would the USA advertise what it has to protect against the other countries? That's stupid!

  54. click trEsni says:

    If we know about it that means its over 25 years old and god knows what we really got.

  55. Blanik L-13 says:

    The missile knows where it is…….

  56. RJ says:

    hey that's our Hmas Canberra 2:00 lol… yep NSM and JASSM XR are badass for jets ships land fired.. even the new land fired GBU-39's SDB's are bad ass especially the naval variant..

  57. ANEESH GOPALAKRISHNAN says:

    We dont want american jets….even though they r the best…they cant be trusted…..

  58. Charles Brightman says:

    Let's see: about 7:13 in the video: LRASM cost about 3 million dollars each, USN plans on getting 467, that's over 1.4 billion dollars. And that is just for one missile type. And Trump gave away one of the largest tax cuts in US history to rich people. No wonder why the US's debt continues to massively grow. We have an actual idiot at the helm.

  59. Stephen Tilford says:

    This just a curious question. Why have you changed the “let’s get started “ to “let’s get into the details “ tag line?

  60. biff shiff says:

    You gringos are so silly.

  61. James Reese says:

    We are outmatched by our adversaries' missiles

  62. ZMAN 420 says:

    Too many ADS!

  63. Richard Maier says:

    once they uplink to sat/com it's all over but the crying.

  64. atul patil says:

    For those who thinks Brahmos is just a speedy, massive, hit or miss missile.
    1) It has some stealthy features : by using composite structure.
    2) sea skimming = as low as 5 to 10 meter, difficult to track.
    3) uses INS / GPS for initial guidance. (Both GLONAS & IRNSS at the same time to add precision)
    4) uses Semi active Laser guide in mid course to terminal phase.
    5) uses Radar Frequency monopulse seeker in terminal phase (like LRASM)
    6) can S-maneuver with 70° steep dive at terminal phase which make almost impossible to be intercepted at close range.
    7) one can choose "7 way points" which can be in snake or any haphazard shape as per user wants to give a path to Brahmos which adds uncertainty in the path & makes it further difficult to lock & intercept.

    Which makes it one of the deadliest cruise missile in the world.
    & in virtual combat system it has been found that 64 Brahmos will kill one entire battle ship including one aircraft carrier.

  65. Sting Cobra says:

    Still United States is the strongest.

  66. Traiano Welcome says:

    Has the US considered that these very same missiles would be used against it's own ships? The US has more targets than the Chinese or Russians. And the chinese can produce more of these, faster than the US can ever hope to …

  67. Double Tap says:

    US HYPERSONIC weapons on the way AGM 184A ARRW, HACKSAW, TACTICAL BOOST GLIDE, HAWC, HSSW… just listing a hand full of pants crappers fot thr Russian and VACHINA TROLLS!

  68. Double Tap says:

    Upgraded next generation F-15X/EX STIKE EAGLE will be equipped in beast modes with HYPERSONIC MISSILES! The swarms of F-35 variants will not only have upgraded F-22 RAPTOR escorts but additional Overwatch of HYPERSONIC VEHICLES Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie SR-72… This is how the arms race works…. Russians and Chinese talk sh1t and the US decides no problem we will pull it off the shelf and upgrade it a little and it goes into production and then service in <24 months or less and now those still talking sh1t in their pants realize USA is now live with the most modern weapons platforms and our competitors used comic books for propoganda and still only have propoganda.

  69. Jaime G says:

    there a way to take contral of a missle

  70. Jeff V says:

    Russia and China have strong navies?

  71. Timo Okello says:

    If the US cannot come up with hypersonic weapons it cannot defend against Russia's weapons… whatever else you say is speculative for now.

  72. M James says:

    0:15
    Is this some kind of joke?
    That's clearly a zombie
    And he clearly has access to some pretty serious weaponry..

  73. Srđan Čalović says:

    Distroy coruption in US first !!!!

  74. Jovan Vojnovic says:

    Instead of cheapishly trying to recruit children through those Computer games the folks in charge should come to terms with the simple fact that the Russians won the arms race. Aircraft Carriers and Carrier Groups are sitting ducks now and strategically completely useless.

    It would be smarter to just stop warmongering finally. Better use that money for your infrastructure, medical system and school instead to waste it on weapons…

  75. TECHY WORLD says:

    Dont joke russia have kinzhal hypersonic missle

  76. Kalasag 911 says:

    TOO MANY FREAKIN' COMMERCIALS!!! UGH!

  77. sciphynuts says:

    Tell me lies…tell me lies…,,tell me.sweet little lies.

  78. Roger Howard says:

    How do these mach 8 missiles stand up to "LAZER WEAPONS?"

  79. Herb Roberts says:

    SAVE YOURSELF SAVE OUR COUNTRY STOP VOTING FOR DEMOCRATS THEY HAVE BECOME THE ENEMY OF FREEDOM.

  80. Herb Roberts says:

    Make no mistake the United States in every arena of combat are the best high tech killers on the face of the planet.

  81. AcidBot66 says:

    Is that based on Patriot proven crap technology?
    Poor Saudis!

  82. Bob King says:

    People are taking design notes from Star Trek again, I see. That's a lo-tech photon torpedo.

  83. The Write In President says:

    And The Teacher Spoke… This Book that I decided {needed to be made} so there was something from Johnny Exodice that could {be called} his works……., rather then just a collection of his works {{{for the world}}} to come is why I did put this one together……, so if you have read this far….., and ponder {my thoughts} +=+ as The Oracle for the End of An Age connected to The Source of All Creation…., and you wonder {why no Books} / * on Johnny Exodice exist…, and his Facebook is gone.., his Google+ is Gone.., and why {the Twitter account} [{**}] still remains??? That is because I have lost the phone numbers {to that account} to access it and piss off the FREE MASON INTERNATIONALIST {whom did} [{*}] remove Alex Jones from all talking points, and the man {who raged one day} on a YouTube and said: Where is the Prophet!!!???…, So, I revealed myself to him {after many years} of doing these Teacher Written Works with the Tag of Buddah~ Now, it is very hard for me to {make any money} for the things I write for they expose this PURGATORY Celestial Sphere {2 Sided FLAT EARTHS} as a Simulation Place for Redemption – Reconciliation, and A WAY to see that what is happening in this {year of 8,001 T.L.} aka Time Line called 2019 C.E. or A.D. if you are an Older 20th Century Reader, that TIME is as much an illusion {as anything} when The Sun just makes {A Circle in the Sky} as The Bible in Proverbs state: There is NOTHING New under the sun…., so we are repeating our lives, and watching events unfold once more where {we will Rip open} the Sky known as THE RIFT or Milkey Way Scar…., and these 5G Titanic Towers are the Pyramid Weapons of Old that {Shot Lucifer the Angel} aka an old Egyptian Word for Stars in Heaven out of the Firmament…., where once again Jesus says: And Lucifer Fell from the Heavens and {it Looked Like} Lightening as the Angel was Blow out of the Dome by {NASA Ratheon Weapons} in our FLAT EARTH Dome Covered Earthly Corporeal Material Reality… I will eventually put this book on USB…., and down load it to others, so you can {have access} to all my Writ, and Legalize Maritime Admiralty LAWS revelations, but just know, when you sleep and dream that is but {a Past or Future De – Ja – Vu} in the Esoteric World of our Dreams as we are still {at this time} Trapped in this PURGATORY PRISON known as the FREE MASON Lodges Oraborus Curse of Repeat – Repeat – Repeat…., and as the Weather Gets Worse from Chemicals being sprayed into the sky by DRONE Jumbo Jets controlled {by The Machine} known as The EDISON in Santa Barbara CALIFORNIA USA…., just know we once had a Yellow Sun and anyone {my age of 54 years} and older knows this to be truth, so the White Hot Sun we now have is part of Armageddon, and if you nonmason my Pak-Toe Romantic Warriors {do not take out} these SUN SHIELDS, and Trillion Watt Laser on them NASA Military Bases…., then we will all burn like the State of CALIFORNIA USA as they fake the Book of Revelation to try and make {Our Celestial Sphere} to Crack wide open, and The People and Populations of the world will be Screaming and Shouting THE SKY IS FALLING!!!…, and cause these {GOLEM Machine Spirits} wish to CEASE TO EXIST once and for all…, and to take us Human Humane Spirits of life {along with them} in the process if we of Pak-Toe do not STOP The Racka, then The Purgatorium will come to cease to exist for all life and all death, and no more future Births for any, and no way to return to The Spiral, or our origination home worlds the Many other Celestial Spheres you see as Stars in the Night Skies……. The Book of EXODICE!!! [///|||\]

  84. Michael Aitchison says:

    How does it avoid CWIS? Swarm mode?

  85. Carl Ryan says:

    Nothing succeeds like excess.

  86. Amoroso Gombe says:

    $3M a copy! That's an expensive miss!

  87. Tom C says:

    A huge waste of money. China, Russia, and even India all have hypersonic anti ship missiles with much bigger warheads on them than these missiles do, plus this LRASM cruise missile that we are bragging about in this video are very slow, ( subsonic ). We need missiles that are mach 10+ with a warhead big enough to blow any ship in half. Anything less than this is a waste of money.

  88. Lino Benetti says:

    just a question
    how this missile can slip through Russian ciws and other laser iron domes ?

  89. Kris Frederick says:

    Bring on the acronyms baby

  90. Gaza kingpin says:

    Just start the war already let me watch the fire works

  91. Peter Baumgaertner says:

    Oh my oh my, the Communist have something to look forward to when we kill them all. Lolol all the way through the end of this. They might have speed Wich means nothing when we knock them out of the shy but they have no defense to this. Lolol

  92. dipayan saha says:

    Brahmos range is 600km

  93. dipayan saha says:

    Brahmos NG has velocity of 3.5mach

  94. patrick kelly says:

    We didn’t keep up with anti ship missiles because no one left had a credible navy. They still don’t.

  95. Cal Crappie says:

    LRASM looks very good! What's even more scary for the enemy is the fact that it can be fired from the stealthy F-35.

  96. Manoj Harsha TKD says:

    In Saudi… Missile defence work great 😅😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣

  97. Brokejoker says:

    Wait, is the LRASM the same missiles that were shot down by the Syrian missile defense system?

  98. John H says:

    Finally, the US is catching up to it's adversaries.

  99. TheWheels1965 says:

    Any country that sinks a large US war ship, is in serious trouble in the shape of a mushroom cloud!

  100. CAG Hotshot says:

    LRASM has been deployed since Q1 2019. Where have you been? Talk about late with the friggin news!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *